Post by jabinkhatun908 on Feb 24, 2024 22:03:20 GMT -8
On the Contrary According to Populism the Leader Embodies the People and It is by Virtue of This Direct and Unmediated Relationship That He Can Be Said to Represent Them. Yves Sintomer Illustrates the Idea of Embodied Representation With Some Useful Examples the Words Representationincarnation Appear Explicitly in Much of Caesarist Logic Whether Populist or Neopopulist. As a Second Empire Theorist Wrote in the Emperor is Not a Man He is a People Something That Seems to Be Echoed in That Proclamation by Former.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chvez I Demand Absolute Loyalty to My Leadership Because I Am Not I Myself ... Am Not an Individual I Am a People a Proclamation That His Supporters Replicated Two Years Later When Gathered en Masse on the Occasion of His Funeral Germany Mobile Number List They Took Up a Regime Motto We Are All Chvez Only Because and to the Extent That the Leader is One of Them Can He Claim to Represent Them. And It is Precisely This Direct Relationship Between the Leader and His People That Makes Intermediary Actors Such as Parties Independent Media Institutional Norms Bureaucracy Control Organizations Etc. Suspicious.
Obviously the Relationship of Incarnation an Assumption of Homogeneity. The Leader Can Only Be Like the People if the People Themselves Are a Homogeneous and Unified Body Capable of Having a Relationship of Identity or at Least Sufficient Similarity With Them Only in This Way is It Possible to Justify the Affirmation of Incarnation. If the People Were Divided Into Plural or Disparate Groups With Conflicting Views Values Interests and Political Objectives the Leader Could Not Simultaneously Be Like All of Them.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chvez I Demand Absolute Loyalty to My Leadership Because I Am Not I Myself ... Am Not an Individual I Am a People a Proclamation That His Supporters Replicated Two Years Later When Gathered en Masse on the Occasion of His Funeral Germany Mobile Number List They Took Up a Regime Motto We Are All Chvez Only Because and to the Extent That the Leader is One of Them Can He Claim to Represent Them. And It is Precisely This Direct Relationship Between the Leader and His People That Makes Intermediary Actors Such as Parties Independent Media Institutional Norms Bureaucracy Control Organizations Etc. Suspicious.
Obviously the Relationship of Incarnation an Assumption of Homogeneity. The Leader Can Only Be Like the People if the People Themselves Are a Homogeneous and Unified Body Capable of Having a Relationship of Identity or at Least Sufficient Similarity With Them Only in This Way is It Possible to Justify the Affirmation of Incarnation. If the People Were Divided Into Plural or Disparate Groups With Conflicting Views Values Interests and Political Objectives the Leader Could Not Simultaneously Be Like All of Them.